What vitamin D level should I be aiming for?
Written and medically reviewed by Zahraa Sater, M.D., M.P.H.
Reviewed August 12, 2026 · Next review due August 12, 2028
Short answer
For bone and general health, the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements treats a 25-hydroxyvitamin D of 20 ng/mL or above as adequate and levels above 50 ng/mL as potentially harmful. The 2011 Endocrine Society guideline used a higher target of 30 ng/mL for at-risk patients. The 2024 Endocrine Society guideline recommends against routine vitamin D testing in healthy adults.
There is no single agreed vitamin D target, and the disagreement is worth understanding rather than hiding. Two respected bodies set different numbers because they were answering different questions. The dietary reference intakes ask what level covers the needs of the population for bone health. The 2011 Endocrine Society guideline asked what level to aim for in patients already at risk of deficiency. The 2024 Endocrine Society guideline then changed the framing again by asking whether testing helps healthy people at all.
The numbers each body uses
The NIH Office of Dietary Supplements sets out four bands for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D: below 12 ng/mL is deficient, 12 to below 20 ng/mL is generally inadequate, 20 ng/mL or above is generally adequate for bone and overall health, and above 50 ng/mL is linked to potential adverse effects. Vitamin D toxicity with hypercalcaemia is usually seen above 150 ng/mL. The 2011 Endocrine Society guideline defined deficiency as below 20 ng/mL, insufficiency as 21 to 29 ng/mL and sufficiency as 30 to 100 ng/mL for people at risk.
Who should be tested
The 2011 Endocrine Society guideline states: "We recommend screening for vitamin D deficiency in individuals at risk for deficiency. We do not recommend population screening for vitamin D deficiency in individuals who are not at risk." The 2024 Endocrine Society guideline went further and recommended against routine 25-hydroxyvitamin D testing in generally healthy adults, including adults with obesity and dark skin, on the grounds that the levels producing outcome-specific benefits have not been established in trials. In 2021 the US Preventive Services Task Force issued an I statement, concluding that evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening asymptomatic adults.
Who the 2024 guideline still recommends supplementing
The 2024 Endocrine Society guideline suggests empiric supplementation, without testing first, for four groups: children and adolescents aged 1 to 18, adults aged 75 and over, people who are pregnant, and adults with high-risk prediabetes. Testing remains appropriate for people with malabsorption, chronic kidney disease, osteoporosis, hyperparathyroidism, prior bariatric surgery, or unexplained low calcium or high alkaline phosphatase, because in those situations the result changes what is done next.
| 25-hydroxyvitamin D | Interpretation | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Below 12 ng/mL | Deficient | NIH Office of Dietary Supplements |
| 12 to below 20 ng/mL | Generally inadequate | NIH Office of Dietary Supplements |
| 20 ng/mL and above | Generally adequate for bone health | NIH Office of Dietary Supplements |
| 30 to 100 ng/mL | Sufficiency target for at-risk patients | 2011 Endocrine Society guideline |
| Above 50 ng/mL | Linked to potential adverse effects | NIH Office of Dietary Supplements |
If your level is between 20 and 30 ng/mL and you have no bone disease, malabsorption or kidney disease, the honest answer is that the evidence does not support chasing a higher number. If you are supplementing, keep to a daily dose rather than large intermittent doses, and do not aim for a level above 50 ng/mL.
The clinical detail
The 2024 Endocrine Society guideline is a change in approach rather than a change in thresholds. It suggests empiric supplementation in four populations and recommends against routine 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurement in generally healthy adults, noting that outcome-specific target levels have not been established in trials. The trials underpinning the four suggestions used median daily intakes in the region of 1,200 IU in children and adolescents, 900 IU in adults over 75, 2,500 IU in pregnancy and 3,500 IU in high-risk prediabetes.
Measure 25-hydroxyvitamin D, not 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. The 2011 guideline notes that 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D does not reflect vitamin D reserves and can be normal or raised in deficiency because of secondary hyperparathyroidism. High dose biotin can also interfere with 25-hydroxyvitamin D immunoassays.
Written and medically reviewed by Zahraa Sater, M.D., M.P.H.
Reviewed August 12, 2026 · Next review due August 12, 2028
Sources
- Vitamin D: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. NIH Office of Dietary Supplements
- Vitamin D for the Prevention of Disease: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline (2024). The Endocrine Society
- Evaluation, Treatment, and Prevention of Vitamin D Deficiency: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline (2011). The Endocrine Society, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. DOI 10.1210/jc.2011-0385
- Vitamin D Deficiency: Screening (2021, Grade I statement). US Preventive Services Task Force
- Vitamin D Deficiency. MedlinePlus, National Library of Medicine
This library is educational and is not individual medical advice. Read our Editorial and Medical Review Policy.